There
is just no way we can put a positive spin on a brutal rape. But… I guess a
boy’s dad is bound to try. When the evil deed came out Shechem’s dad
attempted to recharacterize the situation. “Look at the big picture!” he
said. “It’s a small price to pay for becoming our relatives and sharing our
wealth, and really…my son loves her!”"
Really?
I wonder what Dinah thought about that kind of affection…
We
often use such a guise to cover up our bad behavior. Before we know it, we no
longer evaluate the morality of our behavior itself but of the possible results
of the behavior. Joseph Fletcher called it “situational ethics“.
Jacob
fell into the same trap. After his sons got vengeance he said “you
have brought trouble on me…I and my household will be destroyed.” So…the
action itself has no moral weight of its own. It depends on the results. In
basketball they call it “no harm, no foul” which of course is a
lie. A foul is a foul whether injury is inflicted or not…unless we
officially change the definition. Even at that, the concept of “harm’ is pretty
subjective. Rick Porter broke my nose (unintentionally, I think) during
a “pick-up” basketball game at SPBC. No foul was called! So, even the
revised rule isn’t always dependable.
God is
not in the business of changing definitions. He has made right and
wrong perfectly clear. We can beg God to look at the bigger picture but I
suspect He doesn’t have to. He “IS” the bigger picture.
Live
boldly out there today…
No comments:
Post a Comment