Until last week…
Erik posted an interesting quote on his Facebook page: "Art no longer cares to
serve the state and religion, it no longer wishes to illustrate the history of
manners, it wants to have nothing further to do with the object, as such, and
believes that it can exist, in and for itself, without "things" (that
is, the "time-tested well-spring of life")." – Malevich
To which I responded: I have to
think about that. Do ideas qualify as "objects"? I wonder how art
even springs from the mind without some object.
So we had a conversation…
Erik says art is about creation, not about
meaning or purpose. It is not created to last (although, sometimes it does). It is not created to “say something” (although,
sometimes it does). It is created to “be”.
He used the example of somebody walking through the forest and creating a
particular formation out of the leaves…for no other purpose than the passion
and pleasure of doing so. The wind will blow the leaves away momentarily but
that has nothing to do with what was created. It is “art” and it “is”
regardless of lifespan.
Art is not to be evaluated by how I feel
about it (“serving the state or religion”).
Art has value and integrity purely by virtue of its existence.Hmmm…
I thought about the Sidewalk artists on Larimer Square. They spend hours creating masterpieces that will disappear with the first rain. Yet, their passion and pleasure knows no bounds. It is the “creation”, not the review.
I woke up
this morning with a great deal of anticipation. What will my life look like
this evening, after a day at the canvas? I actually began thinking in terms of “seconds”.
Is God painting this moment, or am I?
My life has become very exciting and
dynamic…all because my son helped me think differently.
