A lot of people were now becoming followers of the Lord. But some of the ones who spoke Greek started complaining about the ones who spoke Aramaic. They complained that the Greek-speaking widows were not given their share when the food supplies were handed out each day.
The twelve apostles called the whole group of followers together and said, "We should not give up preaching God's message in order to serve at tables. My friends, choose seven men who are respected and wise and filled with God's Spirit. We will put them in charge of these things. We can spend our time praying and serving God by preaching." This suggestion pleased everyone, and they began by choosing Stephen. He had great faith and was filled with the Holy Spirit. Then they chose Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and also Nicolaus, who worshiped with the Jewish people in Antioch. These men were brought to the apostles. Then the apostles prayed and placed their hands on the men to show that they had been chosen to do this work. God's message spread, and many more people in Jerusalem became followers. Even a large number of priests put their faith in the Lord.
Organization is key to success...even in the church. Today the Apostles recognize they don't have enough time to preach the gospel and serve the Body of Christ at the same time. So, they appointed servants (deacons).
What does it take to be a good servant? How about "teachable, humble, obedient, deferential and respectful?" Sounds about right, but those qualities aren't mentioned in this text. Would we say "respected"? "Wise"? "Filled with the Holy Spirit"? Probably not...those seem to be qualities of a good leader.
So, I find myself wondering...how have we gotten so mixed up?
Mali has always suggested that one of the biggest problems with preachers is they think they can do everything well...when God has not called them to do everything. Usually the result is that we do alot of things in passable fashion.
But I digress...
Might I suggest that if we chose our deacons in the same way the Apostles did we might be far more effective. The preachers could stick to praying and preaching, the elders could stick to faith and practice, while our deacons could focus on running (serving) the church.
But we have such difficulty leaving them alone to do it. I wonder if its because we've used the wrong list of qualifications...or like Mali suggests...we want to do it all? Either way, it's not the deacons' fault.
And...the Body of Christ suffers...
Live boldly out there today...